Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Farewell to the Fine Arts Museums



High winds cleared San Francisco's foggy coastal skies today, and I decided to check out an exhibit of rich French people's jewelry at the Legion of Honor Museum in the Richmond District.



At the Membership Desk at the front of the museum, I admitted my ambivalence about renewing the membership to a trio of middle-aged white ladies who were hovering around the computer screens.



"Why is that?" asked one of them. "Because of this institution's and Dede Wilsey's opposition to Healthy Saturdays," I told them, "which struck me as just crummy. You could have stayed out of it."



"Well, I live in that neighborhood near the deYoung," one of the women replied, "so I don't have any sympathy for your position. In fact, I waited for four hours at City Hall to testify against the closure." This was no doubt while parking and driving in my neighborhood, an irony lost on her. I grabbed my membership card back from her colleague and announced that I had changed my mind about renewal.



It's bad enough that San Francisco's so-called art museums seem to be devoting themselves to stupid rich womens' obsessions lately, from French jewelry to Nan Kempner's dresses, but the sheer arrogance involved in that Membership Volunteer's reply, with her refusal to have her suburban lifestyle within San Francisco inconvenienced for one second, seriously pissed me off.



So after a walk along nearby Lands' End, I returned home and cut up the membership card. Then I checked the internet to find out how much all of us are subsidizing these elitist institutions as taxpayers. However, the budget is nowhere on the Fine Arts Museums website and though the amounts may be hidden somewhere on the sfgov.org site, good luck trying to unearth it. As for finding an actual human being to answer the phone at the Fine Arts Museums, the only person I could find was Brian in Accounting, who didn't know where the budget might be on the web, but at least he was helpful and actually working. Give the guy a raise.

Labels: , ,

20 Comments:

Blogger joelynn114 said...

Check out the link, “Mayor's Proposed 2007-2008 Budget (PDF)” at http://www.sfgov.org/site/mayor_index.asp?id=27047. Download the pdf file and see pdf p. 76 here.

10:53 PM  
Blogger sfmike said...

Dear Joe: Thank you, Answer Man. Is that $109.41 (million, I presume) in the proposed budget for the Fine Arts Museums a conglomeration of both General Fund money and Hotel Tax money? Is that the entire budget for the museum or just the city and county contribution? And where the fuck can one find a pie chart breaking down where the Fine Arts Museums revenue comes from? No wonder they can't create a city budget, nobody has any information.

I'm also noticing that the Fine Arts Museums are proposing a 4% increase in the budget this year. What in god's name for? I think Mister Daly needs to be alerted as he continues to go for the Newsom jugular.

10:59 PM  
Anonymous Heidi said...

Oooh, nice walk in the park. Bummer about that museum, I was all poised to check out some fancy jewelry.

10:29 AM  
Blogger pjwv said...

I'm mystified by that volunteer's response to you. Usually the old white ladies in the museums are genial and polite, or at least have enough sense not to alienate someone who wants to renew. Cars like cigarettes elicit strong and not always rational responses.
But check out the Yoshitoshi woodblock exhibit at the Asian -- that's a good show. I haven't seen the Manga show yet.

10:41 AM  
Blogger sfmike said...

Dear pjwv: I was mystified too. What has really been irritating me about the Fine Arts Museums' stand on the road closing initiatives in Golden Gate Park is that not only were they being controversial jerks using my membership money, but they are also receiving over $10 million annually in San Francisco City and County tax money that everyone pays. And what do the citizens get out of that? Free entrance on the first Tuesday of every month when most working people are, well, working.

Dear Heidi: They wouldn't have let me take pictures of the French Jewelry anyway. That's another one of the museums' charming habits. Nobody can take a picture of their "special" exhibitions but themselves, and then they put up crappy little images on the internet, or use fancier, high-resolution photos to sell in their gift shops.

10:58 AM  
Anonymous denisdekat said...

I fidn taht SF lost it's heart and soul once the freaking 99ers and their empty greed infested the city...

I almost hate the internet for this...

11:07 AM  
Blogger sfwillie said...

Re: your photos of the G'Gate.

You get to live in this beautiful environment but it's still complain complain complain.

I know, I complain a lot, too.

12:56 PM  
Blogger janinsanfran said...

Gossip I've heard from museum staff is that they are sick of precious shows for old rich ladies too. Sad!

What a beautiful day yesterday was! I often run the short Lands End Coastal trail.

12:57 PM  
Blogger Jackson West said...

Call me an elitist (or an anti-intellectual -- I get both), but since when do fashion and jewelery count as "fine art?"

12:59 PM  
Blogger Spots said...

Jackson West, the next time I see you, we're having a lesson on the history and artistic importance of costumes and couture...

1:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ignatius Reilly has nothing on you. what a whiner.

1:52 PM  
Anonymous Mathias said...

Amen SF Mike. Our membership is set to expire soon, we don't plan to renew it. What these people need to realize is they don't represent the interests of the people of San Francisco when they behave in this manner, using membership money to fight such a proposal as Healthy Saturdays (in our own public park!).

Also, ditto the remarks about the costume and jewelry, one or two exhibits a year is fine, but back to back and at both museums?

3:21 PM  
Blogger JoannaOC said...

I don't live in town and can't cut up my membership card, but I am pissed at them because the museums decided to go with an out of town restaurant group after reopening the DeYoung instead of the local group, so my mom lost her job. On the other hand, she's now loving life and making money as an artist, so maybe it was for the best.

6:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This sounds like sour grapes. If the museums came out to support Healthy Saturdays you wouldn't be complaining about the money they spent.

I think you had the wrong idea about your relationship to the Fine Arts Museums and you're just upset to discover that. Being a member doesn't mean the museums represent you or your opinions. It's just a discount card. You get one if you're a frequent visitor so you can save money in the long run. It has nothing to do with how the museums are run.

If you're really upset about tax money being spent on them, don't complain to the museum. You have no say in how they spend it. Complain to your supervisor and to the mayor's office. Tell them not to give away your tax money in the first place.

Although I do hope when you complain you won't be a hypocrite and single out the Fine Arts Museums. Rather I hope you oppose all tax money going to the arts, not just institutions that believe their visitors are better served by driving.

5:25 PM  
Blogger sfmike said...

Dear anonymous: I have complained to my supervisor, who happens to be the chair of the Budget Committee, asking him why the deYoung and the Legion of Honour were getting over $5 million in General Fund money while giving essentially nothing back to the larger community besides "Free First Tuesdays of the Month" which won't even get you into the special exhibits. Never mind that it's a complete insult to working San Franciscans.

As for hypocrisy, I believe in dispensing public money towards artists, and always have. However, those two museums have been getting both more elitist and provincial in the worst ways, and now that Dede Wilsey treats them as her private fiefdom, it has only become more grotesquely obvious.

As a public institution receiving public funds, the Fine Arts Museums could and should have remained neutral on the "Healthy Saturdays" debate. As pjwv puts it earlier in this thread, cars and cigarettes tend to bring out strong, irrational responses. But no, they acted like the big bully on the block, and it was their way or no way, and it's time there were some consequences to their behavior.

By the way, the "Fine Arts Museums" are only those two museums and have nothing to do with any other museums or arts funding. Yet they get a huge share of the budget pie, from both the Hotel Tax Fund and the General Fund, which is essentially the poor and the middle-class subsidizing the rich yet again.

6:30 PM  
Blogger sfwillie said...

Re: Jewelery, Fashion, and Art

I'd take a Faberge egg over any painting currently hanging in the brown pile. Didn't Michaelangelo and Leonardo design clothing for the Pope? (I know, but not for Nan.)

Re: Fine Arts Budget

Turn the De Young into an indoor skateboard park. Use "fine arts budget" to subsidize trips to real museums in other cities. (A pilot program could subsidize trips to the UC Berkeley Art Museum.)

It's disinformation to take SF schoolkids to the DeYoung and tell them they're seeing a museum, when it's really just a rich people's party venue.

Arrive by bike, arrive by car, the DeYoung is still the second biggest ripoff in GGP,(#1 is "surrey" rentals.)

6:21 AM  
Blogger greg said...

I think it's important we tax everyone to give as much to the rich people of SF as possible. After all, those big tax cuts they got from GW Bush, and that free war they got, they need a little cushion. Let's give more money to the socialites and set the city on fire, while we're at it.

3:05 PM  
Blogger dobie said...

I hate that they spend our membership $$ on a Marin Co. Marketing person to defeat Healthy Saturdays. And Dede is such a lying phony. At least Warren Hellman stood by his word.
Did you see the article about Paris Hilton last week, where Dede called Paris a "spoiled rich brat?". I almost choked on my pate! Pot-Kettle, etc.

3:11 PM  
Blogger uhfdf said...

情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,

免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,

10:47 AM  
Blogger uhfdf said...

美女脫光光的照片,美女寫真天蠶變下載,蠟筆小新影片,18成人網,自拍寫真,熟女情色貼圖,卡通美女裸體漫畫,176視訊聊天,免費線上影片,台灣美女寫真集圖片館,小魔女貼影片,小弟弟影片,內衣被拿下來的美女,夢工廠成人影音網站,真實做愛照片,檳榔西施清涼秀,xyz辣妹影音聊天網,熊貓成人貼,金瓶梅成人影片交流區,免費情色電影下載,午夜成人,娘家影片,情色小說,免費網路電視,本土自拍貼圖,聊天室avooo,av片,85cc免費影城,台灣自拍寫真照片館,情色圖書館,免費a圖a片,比基尼辣妹影片,拓網交友,台灣人情色貼圖區,正妹圖片,

自拍偷窺貼圖區,視訊交友90739,內衣美女寫真,維克斯論壇,av片,本土自拍照片,176視訊聊天,聊天,搜樂論壇,交友聊天室,無名正妹強力版,109辣妹自拍,檳榔西施自拍照片,kijiji奇集集,pc交友,愛情公寓聊天室,珠海自拍寫真,ut女同聊天室,735聊天室,情色小站,免費情色小說,小瓢蟲論壇,金瓶梅情色文學,後宮電影案,69成人,自拍美女聊天室,聊天ukiss tw,小弟第貼影片,熟女裸體貼圖,kavo,ut 聊天室,後宮色情電影,a片天堂,a片影片,淫蕩少女貼圖,丁字褲美女影片,麗的情色,視訊聊天,人妻自拍貼圖,免費看aa片,

8:46 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home